",000 to the first individual who can provide one copy of any controlled experiment with any of the U. Public Health Service (USPHS) recommended fluorides in water, at the USPHS recommended parts-per-million, which shows that poisonous fluorides are safe and will cause no future body harm." Dr.
In spite of the initial stated purpose of "helping the teeth of children under 14", our military bases were among the first drinking water supplies to be involuntarily fluoridated over 40 years ago. - Note the following entry in an EPA/NIOSH (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health) Hazardous Waste book, on page 3066 under SODIUM FLUORIDE: Human system overdose effects: Burning, prickling, tingling, itching of the skin, drooping of the eyelid, tremors, extra fluid intake, muscle weakness, headache, EKG [brainwave] changes, cyanosis [bluish skin color from inadequate oxygen], respiratory depression, hypermotility [extremely physically active], diarrhea, nausea or vomiting, salivary gland changes, changes in teeth and supporting structures, musculo-skeletal changes, increased immune system response, and human mutatogenic data [mutates human cells, in other words]. Symptoms of intoxication include gastric, intestinal, circulatory, respiratory and nervous complaints and skin rashes." is a combination of the chemical element Fluorine with some other substance. Advertisements by Fluoride promoter Oscar Ewing, head of the Federal Security Agency (FSA) senior to the U. Public Health Service in 1951, left the employ of Alcoa Aluminum not long before he headed up the U. Yes, a 20,000% markup: Fluoride - intended originally for human consumption only by children under 14 years of age - is injected into our drinking water supply at approx."Because of these findings, a test was made of Antigo, Wisconsin water which had been fluoridated for 33 years.The water was examined by a certified Wisconsin laboratory, and showed that when it was used in cooking in aluminum cookware, it concentrated the aluminum by 833 times and increased the fluoride content by 100%.India's responsible research on fluoride toxicity is a properly ethical, up-to-date scientific model, which contrasts strongly with irresponsible and authoritarian fluoridation policy in the West which is based on unethical, low scientific standards and high political opinion.Our major policy decisions demonstrably hinge upon nothing more than emotionally-charged debate where an "expert" dentist endorses an "expert" doctor who refers to "thousands of fluoride studies" in a closed loop like a snake swallowing its own tail, meanwhile neither of them has done their real homework on the subject or they would find that the "thousands of studies" refuting harm FACTUALLY DO NOT EXIST. Robert Mick, DDS, was one of the original scientists who promoted fluoridation, until he did his own animal studies on sodium fluoride in the late 1940's and then abruptly changed his mind after authorities ordered him to cover up his test results.